Our company decided that they should do some cost cutting to get a high profit margin. After spending a lot of money to do a research on how this can be done, they started asking a lot of people at the top level to leave.
We had some changes in a few of our accounts. Here is the story -
Day 1 - Associate A (a senior person from onsite) is asked to leave. He managed two to three accounts - X, Y, Z.
After one to two months - Associate B is hired from the market at a higher level than A. Am sure B's salary package is more than A.
After a couple of days - B understands that there is lot more work to do and she cannot handle everything by herself. So she gets C (who is almost at the same level as her) and then hires D from the market and sends out a note saying - C will manage account X and D will manage account Y.
After a few months - B hires E again from the market to manage a few small accounts including Z.
So now, instead of one person A managing three accounts, we have 4 people to manage these 3 accounts.
Then they finally realize that they are incurring a lot of costs and there is no improvement in account X. So they ask C to leave the company and keep the other three.
I was really good at mathematics in school. But it is so hard for me to understand how we had managed to cut the costs.
Cost of having A is less than cost of having B, C and D, isn't it?
Have people really lost their mind in this company?
My MV: R, shut your mouth. No one asked for your opinion. And will you stop writing all this in your blog. You are definitely going to be kicked out.
We had some changes in a few of our accounts. Here is the story -
Day 1 - Associate A (a senior person from onsite) is asked to leave. He managed two to three accounts - X, Y, Z.
After one to two months - Associate B is hired from the market at a higher level than A. Am sure B's salary package is more than A.
After a couple of days - B understands that there is lot more work to do and she cannot handle everything by herself. So she gets C (who is almost at the same level as her) and then hires D from the market and sends out a note saying - C will manage account X and D will manage account Y.
After a few months - B hires E again from the market to manage a few small accounts including Z.
So now, instead of one person A managing three accounts, we have 4 people to manage these 3 accounts.
Then they finally realize that they are incurring a lot of costs and there is no improvement in account X. So they ask C to leave the company and keep the other three.
I was really good at mathematics in school. But it is so hard for me to understand how we had managed to cut the costs.
Cost of having A is less than cost of having B, C and D, isn't it?
Have people really lost their mind in this company?
My MV: R, shut your mouth. No one asked for your opinion. And will you stop writing all this in your blog. You are definitely going to be kicked out.
No comments:
Post a Comment